Climate Bridge Conference Day 1
Challenges of Climate Change for Spatial and Environmental Planning — An International Dialogue
Register Here for Both Online and In-Person Attendance
Visit the Conference’s Webpage Here for More Information and for a Schedule of Events
This is a two-day hybrid conference at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, October 14–15, 2021. A collaboration between the Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany New York, The Rutgers Center for Urban Environmental Sustainability and the Rutgers Climate Institute.
The goal of the conference is finding new approaches for adapting policy, planning and design to climate
change through the German American comparison. The three conference themes will allow to discover
and acknowledge cultural differences while establishing common ground for the comparative discussion.
From the small village to the mega-city, all peoples are impacted by climate change. Storm surge alters
coastlines, while more frequent severe drought and flood events impact land use including agricultural
practices, forestry, recreational use. However, the impacts of climate change are not equitably
distributed, as impoverished and disadvantaged communities are more vulnerable. The challenge then is
to identify and foster adaptation strategies that can be justly implemented.
As humans, we have a unique experience of and relationship with the land due to our capacity for
creative and effective problem-solving. We can pose questions about how we contribute to the climate
crisis, how we use the Earth, and how we are recipients of abundant gifts. We have the ability to
consider scale in a fluid and flexible manner in order to enter into conversation about community,
diversity, individuality, and identity – from the global to the local. Furthermore, we have the capacity to
put environmental and social justice into practice.
Climate change demands that we understand the physical landscape and interdependent supportive
systems if we are to identify and implement preventative and restorative measures that respond to
social and economic needs and disparities. Such a sense of place requires that we develop an ecological
identity that is finely tuned to the physical character and scale of a place – one that is rooted in
understanding of the dynamic and cyclical processes that are inherent in any natural system.
In our current climate crisis, the physical landscape poses myriad challenges to practices of spatial and
environmental planning – from sea level rise and torrential rains, to urban heat islands and rural
drought. Intimate knowledge of the physical landscape simultaneously presents a world of opportunity
for creative and effective planning solutions grounded in systems thinking and design with nature.
Policy and ensuing regulatory approaches have an inherent lag, yet climate change poses an even
more daunting challenge for environmental planning given the range of uncertainty regarding future
New regulatory policies, along with new planning and administrative approaches that are flexible and
scalable must be developed and implemented. In addition, particular focus must be given to gaining
ecological function rather than simply protecting ecological structure. Maintaining the status quo
through a repetitive cycle of triage responses rather than preventative and restorative care has
positioned policy makers in a precarious position of “too little, too late.” Therefore, it is essential that a
shared language of usable science is spoken between environmental planners, designers, and regulatory
personnel such that “resilience” is not stripped of its integrity.